Fictional example: the candidate and the role are inventedWeighted model v0.4
Fieldstone Foods
Staff Accountant
Denver · Hybrid
82% coverage
Strong evidence of fit
A bookkeeper’s route to staff accounting
Verify the CPA eligibility gate first. The bookkeeping and reporting evidence already covers the weighted requirements.
Recommended next moveVerify eligibility first
An unverified gate could block the application regardless of weighted role coverage.
Confirm: CPA license
Add or verify proof for Compliance
Add or verify proof for Financial analysis
Finance & accountingHigh mapping confidence
What the supplied evidence supports
3fully supported
2transferable
0partial
0not shown
Evidence confidenceHigh
Specific outcomes and more than one analyzed source support this read.
Eligibility checksThese do not get averaged into weighted coverage.
CPA licenseNot shown; verify before relying on this resultVerify
Matched evidence and visible gaps
A gap is a statement about the supplied material: it showed too little proof for that requirement. Whether the candidate can do the work stays an open question.
Evidence
Background: “3 years of bookkeeping and accounting support using QuickBooks and Excel.”
skill
Accounting critical
Accounting is central to finance & accounting work, and the posting reinforces it as required day-to-day work.
Posting: “2+ years of accounting experience required”
Supported
skill
Compliance core
Transfer basis: Accounting. Related work is shown; Compliance itself is not named. Point to where you used it.
Compliance is a core capability for finance & accounting work and named in the role’s day-to-day responsibilities.
The posting explicitly names this experience baseline.
Posting: “2+ years of accounting experience required”
Supported
This is a fit comparison, not a hiring prediction.
The example uses fictional material to demonstrate the evidence model. Real results are only as complete as the candidate and job information provided.