Use the evidence that represents you
No resume, platform, or professional profile is mandatory. Users can combine work history, projects, GitHub, LinkedIn, LeetCode, portfolios, certifications, coursework, volunteer work, publications, or plain notes.
- One strong project can matter more than an empty profile.
- Transferable experience is kept visible.
- Missing proof is not treated as proof of missing ability.
- Private material is not added to a public index.
First, identify what kind of work this is
The prototype maps the posting to a broad occupation family such as operations, healthcare, marketing, finance, education, or software. Job-title signals, responsibilities, and named skills all influence that mapping. The report shows its confidence so the classification can be challenged.
The working taxonomy is U.S.-first and informed by the O*NET occupational database. The current matcher is a deterministic prototype, not a complete O*NET implementation.
Requirements do not all count the same
Importance comes from the role family and the posting itself: explicit “must” language, primary responsibilities, repetition, and preferred-language signals.
Critical
A central job function reinforced as required or used in day-to-day responsibilities.
Core
Required, central to the occupation, or directly used to perform the role.
Supporting
Relevant to the posting, but not central to the primary job function.
Preferred
Nice-to-have evidence can help, but its absence does not reduce baseline coverage.
Weighted coverage is the supported value of critical, core, and supporting requirements divided by their total weight. Preferred items can add a small bonus; missing them never lowers the baseline.
One analysis, three separate outputs
- Weighted coverage shows how much of the important work is supported by the supplied evidence.
- Evidence confidence shows whether the read is based on specific outcomes and enough analyzed material.
- Eligibility checks keep licenses, work authorization, and similar gates outside the coverage score.
Fit bands
Most weighted requirements are supported by the supplied evidence.
The important job functions are substantially supported, with visible gaps.
Some evidence aligns or transfers, but important proof is still missing.
The supplied material does not yet support many weighted requirements.
Every match should point back to evidence
Results name the requirement, show whether supporting material was found, and explain why it received its weight. “Not shown” means the analyzed material did not contain enough proof, not that the person lacks the ability. Profile links are not silently treated as analyzed content; a live importer must verify them first.
What we don’t claim
This tool cannot decide whether someone deserves an interview, predict a hiring decision, measure potential, or know what an employer omitted. It compares the supplied evidence with the observable requirements.
Check my job fit